|
|
|
There
are things which cannot be taught in ten easy lessons, nor
popularised for the masses; |
|
|
|
Residing in Japan, and undertaking extensive travel throughout the country, China and SE Asia, a lengthy cross-comparative analysis provided me with the means to discover, identify and trace which part of what combative-like disciplines made their way to Okinawa from China & SE Asia when and how. Identifying fragmented parts of SE Asian & Qing Period (1644-1911) Fujian Chinese-based quanfa [kenpo] practices haphazardly introduced & secretly cultivated in Okinawa, during the later part of the old Ryukyu Kingdom, I established a working hypothesis and searched for corroboration. In spite of meeting many wonderful Japanese/Okinawa-Chinese/Fujian martial artists, I was looking for a teacher, style, and or organization, which could mentor me in a rational, logical and coherent manner. What I mean by this is…#1. Use HAPV-like rationale as a contextual premise, #2. Employ two-person drills to recreate the HAPV contextual premise, rehearse the prescribed defensive responses, and ultimately gain functional proficiency, #3. Use prescribed templates not only to culminate the lessons already imparted but, when linked together, also demonstrate something recognizable and greater [kata] than the sum total of their individual parts, and, #4. Possess the ability to reveal to me where these unique prescribed templates existed in the classical/Ancestral-based kata handed down to them. This I found nowhere in Okinawa, nor could I locate it in any Japanese/Okinawan style-based publication [old or new]. So, even though there were many great Okinawan martial artists, none I ever met or know of are capable of teaching like this. While looking into the evolution of this embryonic and eclectic history my field studies did bring me into personal contact with many of the most senior authorities of the Japanese/Okinawan, Chinese and SE Asian fighting arts. This contact did, in fact, prove very valuable in my overall studies. Identifying that no less than five individual combative-like disciplines were once embraced during Okinawa's old Ryukyu Kingdom Period, I made a meticulous study of #1. Kata; the original Chinese form [Hsing] of human movement vigorously embraced by men [young & old] of wealth and position, #2. Torite [qinna]; techniques of seizing and controlling employed by local law-enforcement officials, #3. Tegumi; an old Chinese-based [Shuai Chiao] method of clinching & grappling practiced by boys and young men of every age, #4. Tigwa; a plebeian form of percussive impact brought to the island from the Kingdom of Siam [Siamese boxing] and #5. Buki-gwa; the art of weapons. During this study, and with the help of reading Donn Draeger, Joseph Campbell, Karel van Wolferen, Ruth Benedict, Douglas Haring, George Kerr, Taira Koji, and Edwin Reischauer, etc., it became evident that that Zen, and post-Edo/pre-war Japanese Budo Culture [i.e. Judo/Kendo], under the auspices of the Dai Nippon Butoku Kai, had solely influenced the development of modern karate-do. Studying the martial arts since childhood, and having enjoyed a rewarding competitive career, all of my filed research was carried out in Japan, China and SE Asia during a very important and profoundly introspective time of my life. I married, settled down in Japan and started a family, and had taken up the study of swordsmanship under Sugino Yoshio [Tenshin Shoden Katori Shinto Ryu], was also training under Inoue Motokatsu [Ryukyu Kobujutsu Hozon Shink Kai], and entrenched with the principal translations of the Bubishi, and several other important works, all of which had an collective impact upon the way I came to understand karate. During my studies I became most fascinated with the historical contributions of Kojo Taite (1837-1917), Aragaki Seisho (1840-1920), Xie Zhongxiang (1852-1930), Higashionna Kanryo (1853-1917), Hanashiro Chomo (1869-1945), Motobu Choki (1871-1944), Zhou Zhihe (1874-1926), Wu Xianhui (1886-1940), Tang Daiji (1887-1937), Kiyoda Juhatsu (1886-1967), Miao Xing (1881-1939), Oshiro Chojo (1887-1935), Richard Kim (1919-2001), and Kinjo Hiroshi (1919). Based upon my own background, new insights, and keen understanding of what modern karate lacked, I reasoned that by adopting many of these "old", but highly functional practices, I could significantly improve my own training and progress. As I continued to write
about my experiences several international-based magazines became
interested in publishing my work. This ultimately lead to introducing
the functional part of my research at seminars
all over the world where it was, and continues to be, widely embraced.
I introduced my interpretation of this body of concepts as old-school
karate [Koryu Uchinadi], however, it was not until later that it
became necessary to establish a formal name through which to deliver
it. In 1994 I was approached by the president of the
Australian
Karate Federation to develop a generic program in Australia through which to
accredit karate instructors. I saw this as a wonderful opportunity to
publicly introduce my work and it ultimately lead to receiving a full
sponsorship from the ACNM.
Through their assistance I succeeded in establishing Koryu Uchinadi as
an undergraduate program. Complying with ANTA-based competencies [Australian
National Training Authority], and those academic outcomes and corresponding assessment
criteria required at the college level, provided yet another important
stage of development. With the support of my Okinawan teacher, Kinjo
Hiroshi, and wanting to identify China [actually Fujian] as a source
of origin, and emphasize functional application over "character
development" [a lofty goal karate-do purports to cultivate] I
finally settled on Koryu Uchinadi Kenpo-jutsu as a formal name
with which to describe this collective body of work. |
|
|
|
Kata: An Art with a
Thousand Names |
|
In
an effort to combat unwarranted acts of physical violence that plagued
their plebeian existence, early Chinese pioneers of quanfa (the
precursor of Uchinadi) developed hsing/kata. In addition to providing
its (now) obvious physical & holistic value, each ritualised form
served as a collective template with which to address both specific
and generic acts of physical violence. By
identifying which acts of physical violence needed to be addressed,
and then cataloguing them into individual lessons, innovators were
able to, 1. Re-create each act of violence in a safe-learning
environment, and, 2. Explore which defensive responses might best
accommodate each issue. In order to actualise this process pioneers
established two-person drills (what else could they do??) to flow back
and forth so that each learner might experience both the individual
act of physical violence and its corresponding defensive theme. This
simplistic, yet unique, concept provided the opportunity for each
learner to progress progressively or exponentially, depending entirely
upon nature & nurture. Those learners who excelled at this
practice achieved a functional spontaneity enabling them to virtually
negotiate just about any act of physical violence or variation
thereof. By
eliminating the attacker (i.e. The act of violence or contextual basis
to which the defensive response applied) in the two-person training
drill, what remained was a solo re-enactment
of its corresponding defensive counter. Learners were required
to memorize not only the defensive counters for each act of physical
violence used in the two-persona drills, but also their solo
re-enactments. With their own individual names (double Dragons going
out to sea, Guardian closes the gate etc.) each re-enactment was
ultimately ritualised into individual templates. Early
pioneers of this tradition commonly introduced the individual act of
physical violence first and then used the supporting two-person drills
to build competencies. The ritualised re-enactments/templates provided
each learner the opportunity to not only practice movements on their
own but also to express individual creativity and physical prowess.
More importantly, however, the practice became as much mental as it
was physical. Taking the practice into the realm of the mind revealed
the location where all battles must be first fought and won before it
could be effectively used elsewhere. Finally, teachers who used this
format could visually observe and evaluate progress by simply calling
out the individual names of specific templates in any order during
training. What made hsing/kata unique to specific schools (i.e.
styles) was the varying signature geometrical configuration of these
individual templates. At
the height of their sophistication, pioneers had identified no less
than thirty-six (36) habitual acts of physical violence (HAPV),
seventy-two (72) variations on these common themes and a total of one
hundred and eight (108) individual defensive application principles.
Fundamental
training included reception (how to best receive an
attack…erroneously referred to as blocking) developing the simple
tools of penetration (fist & foot etc.), posturing & mobility.
Supplementary training focused upon developing strength, physical
fitness and improving individual skills. This entire process was
enhanced when learners discovered the need to improve their knowledge
of the human body, its unique function and common anatomical
weaknesses. The art was further enhanced through understanding what
biomechanics best supported the transfer of both low intensity (for
pressing, seizing & squeezing etc.) and higher velocity kinetic
energy transfer (collision-style impact).
Uchinadi
old-school kata practice, unique to the later part of Okinawa’s old
Ryukyu Kingdom, trace their roots to Fujian quanfa and this heritage.
|
|
|
|
The Enemy Within KU
is also a provocative alternative to conventional methods of physical
fitness and stress management. Learning how to respond dispassionately
to unwarranted aggression requires self-empowerment. Such training
promotes an inner-calm and, where conflict exists, helps restore
balance to personal and professional relationships. The Pen
and the Sword A
non-competitive, totally application-based defensive practice,
punctuated with moral philosophy and highlighted by introspective
teaching, KU is a comprehensive single study. It serves to improve
health, its holistic purpose; be better prepared to protect oneself,
its defensive application; build moral character, its social aim;
discover and overcome the source human weakness; its philosophical
nature; and finally, to know inner-peace, its spiritual essence.
Possessing
the skill of a warrior and the mind of a scholar provides any learner
the knowledge to realize that winning a fight doesn't always mean
resorting to physical violence. Physical training may make a person
strong and provide the ability to protect oneself, as a last resort,
but what is internalized from this study truly produces mastery. KU promotes this balance between the physical and mental aspects of our lives so they can work as one and improve our self-control. Accepting mental challenges and transforming them into positive energy, through Koryu Uchinadi, can and does improve our ability to greater control over our own daily lives. Koryu
Uchinadi reminds each of us of our own humanity, the importance of
improving the quality of daily life and our responsibility to
contribute to the welfare of society. Honouring traditional values,
The International Ryukyu Karate Research Society is an organization
dedicated to sharing this timeless message with a new generation of
more progressive Western learner seeking to better understand the
Okinawan/Japanese art of karate and not afraid to look outside their
own peer groups to find it. Patrick McCarthy |
|
|
|
"Let us become your partner in the learning process & serve rather than be served." |
|
|
|
|
* Special Note: Any and all historical testimony and verifiable documentation [or even one's own working theory] that either refutes or better explains what is depicted anywhere on this website is most certainly welcome...anytime. |